Instructor
Related Videos
Boycotts I: Klor’s, Inc. v Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.
This video will cover Per Se Condemnation of all Group Boycotts: Klor’s, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., 359 U.S. 207 (1959).
Boycotts III: Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.
Northwest Wholesale Stationers v. Pacific Stationery and Printing, 472 U.S. 284 (1985): Narrowing the Per Se Rule Against Group Boycotts.
Boycotts II: United States Trotting Association v Chicago Downs Association, Inc.
United States Trotting Association v. Chicago Downs Ass’n, 666 F.2d 781 (7th Cir. 1981): Flexible Application of the Per Se Rule Against Group Boycotts
Horizontal Restraints: Foundational Cases 1, Rule of Reason – Chicago Board of Trade v US and US v Trenton Potteries Co.
This is the recording for Foundational Cases on Horizontal Restraints Cases Part 1 – Chicago Board of Trade v US and US v Trenton Potteries Co.
Horizontal Restraints: Foundational Cases 2, Per Se Rule – Appalachian Coals and Socony – Vacuum Oil Co.
This is the video for Foundational Cases for Horizontal Restraints: Foundational Cases Part 2 – Appalachian Coals (Socony) and Socony – Vacuum Oil Co.
Lessons on the Per Se Rule: Catalano, Inc. v Target Sales, Inc. and Arizona v Maricopa County Medical Society
Lessons on the Per Se Rule: Catalano, Inc. v Target Sales, Inc. and Arizona v Maricopa County Medical Society
Modern Horizontal Restraints Analysis II: National Society of Professional Engineers v US
Modern Horizontal Restraints Analysis: National Society of Professional Engineers v US
Modern Horizontal Restraints Analysis III: Polk Bros. v Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
Reviving the Ancillary Restraints Doctrine: Polk Brothers, Inc. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc., 776 F.2d 185 (7th Cir. 1985).
Join Antitrust Academy today!
Subscribe now for access to our comprehensive catalog of antitrust law and economics courses. Antitrust Academy is FREE for students and government employees.
