Market Definition Example: FTC v. Staples

Please login or register to
watch the video

Video Description

In this video we take a closer look at market definition and the Hypothetical Monopolist Test in FTC v. Staples-Office Depot.

Instructor

Joshua Wright

Professor of Law, Founder of Lodestar Law and Economics, PLLC

Related Videos

2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines Overview

This video provides a brief overview of the role of merger guidelines generally, and the analytical techniques and methods in the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines. While the 2010 Guidelines are no longer actively endors...

Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Hypothetical Monopolist Test and Market Definition

In this video, we discuss the market definition and introduce the Hypothetical Monopolist test commonly used to define relevant products and geographic markets.

Clayton Act Section 7: Introduction

This video introduces Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which governs the antitrust analysis of horizontal and vertical mergers and acquisitions. We introduce the key elements of the statute, the legal and economic framework...

Merger Efficiencies: Overview, Economics, and Case Law

Economics of merger efficiencies and how the antitrust agencies incorporate efficiencies in their investigations of mergers.

Potential Competition: FTC v Meta/Within

Case study of FTC v. Meta Platforms and what it could mean for potential competition cases going forward.

Structural Presumption I: Brown Shoe, Co., Inc. v US

This video introduces the structural approach to Section 7 analysis exemplified by the Court in Brown Shoe, Co., Inc. v US and later in US v Philadelphia National Bank.

Structural Presumption: Practical Significance

In this video, we discuss the practical significance of the PNB presumption in modern litigation, its strength was invoked, its relationship with the 2020 Merger Guidelines’ non-market share based framework, and sh...

Structural Presumption IV: US v Baker Hughes, Inc.

In this video we examine the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Baker Hughes. We introduce its burden-shifting framework, discuss the various ways a defendant might satisfy its rebuttal burden in a Section...

Structural Presumption III: US v General Dynamics Corp.

This video continues our study of the evolution of the structural presumption in US v. General Dynamics. We focus on General Dynamic’s treatment of rebuttal evidence, the link between market definition and competit...

Structural Presumption II: US v Philadelphia National Bank (PNB)

In this video we introduce the “PNB Presumption,” the evolution of the structural presumption set forth in Brown Shoe, and preview the importance of PNB in modern Section 7 litigation.

Understanding Unilateral Effects

We explore the basic economics underlying unilateral price effects arising from a horizontal merger. We also introduce the Gross Upward Pricing Pressure Index, or GUPPI, as a diagnostic tool introduced in the Merger Guid...

Vertical Mergers: Framework and US v. ATT / TW

This video discusses vertical mergers — the distinction between horizontal and vertical mergers, the “why” of vertical mergers, the theories of harm from vertical mergers, the controversy over vertical merger...

Join Antitrust Academy today!

Subscribe now for access to our comprehensive catalog of antitrust law and economics courses. Antitrust Academy is FREE for students and government employees.

Register